Monday, January 28, 2013

Pessimistic Links


Just in case you are feeling good about things in general (or about the state of higher ed in the West), these links will cure you...

  1. Paula Stephan in Chemistry World: Too many scientists? She uses "pyramid scheme" to describe the current way of training PhDs.

    [Update: The Science Careers essay announcing Prof. Stehpan as the Person of the Year is very good too. I thank Swarup for the link, via a comment on this post].

  2. Beryl Lieff Benderly in Miller McClune: The Real Science Gap: "Business leaders have cried "scientist shortage," but scores of thousands of young Ph.D.s are laboring in U.S. university labs as low-paid, temporary workers, ostensibly training for permanent faculty positions that will never exist."

  3. Livre d'Or: Dear Brilliant Students: Please Consider not Doing a PhD. Long rant -- overly pessimistic, UK-centric, and perhaps humanities centric, as well. Has some brutally frank commentary about academic culture -- especially about student-adviser relationship. [Thanks to Appaiah for the e-mail alert]

Are Joint PhD Programs Worth It?


The Economic Times reports that IIT-M is considering such programs with US universities.

IIT Madras, like many top institutions, had a number of collaborations between the faculty in many universities. But [IIT-M Director Prof. Bhaskar] Ramamurthy wanted to take the collaboration to a deeper level culminating in a joint PhD programme in the near future.

This is not really a new idea. Jaideep Srivastava and Pankaj Jalote mooted something similar five years ago [I didn't like it.] IIT-B has already implemented a version of this idea an arrangement with Monash University in Australia (I'm not sure if a joint PhD degree is a part of this deal, though). Heck, IIT-M itself has tried it with NUS, Singapore -- and has very little to show for it. ET doesn't go into the why this arrangement didn't pan out, or how it'll be different in its new avatar.

Saturday, January 26, 2013

Links


All of them are about Aaron Swartz, his suicide, and its aftermath.

  1. First, a video of the speech by Taren Stinebrickner-Kauffman at the Aaron Swartz Memorial in New York.

  2. Lawrence Lessig in The Atlantic blog: Aaron's Law: Violating a Site's Terms of Service Should Not Land You in Jail.

  3. Following strong criticism of MIT's role in the prosecution of Aaron Swartz (especially from Aaron's family), MIT President Rafael Reif has asked Prof. Hal Abelson to review "MIT's involvement" in "events arising from actions taken by Aaron Swartz to access JSTOR through the MIT computer network." Abelson has set the ball rolling with an open letter to the MIT community, and with a website where "you [the MIT community] can suggest questions and issues to guide this review and you can comment on the questions of others." [The website is open to public to view.]

Update: CNET reports that Aaron might not have faced the threat of decades of jail term if the Federal Prosecutor had not taken the case over.

Republic Day Awards


Happy Republic Day, folks!

It's great to see some familiar names in this year's list of Republic Day Awards, aka the Padma Awards -- Padma Vibhushan, Padma Bhushan, and Padma Shri.

Hearty congratulations to Prof. Roddam Narasimha (JNC, Bangalore), Prof. Ajay Sood (a senior colleague at IISc) and Prof. K. Vijay Raghavan (Director of NCBS, Bangalore, and occasional commenter (!) here ;-)!

Thursday, January 24, 2013

Rationalist at IIT-M


In an antidote of sorts to this fiasco from December, IIT-M invited Mr. Narendra Nayak (President, Federation of Indian Rationalist Associations) to present a lecture on the topic of "The Need for Rational Thinking." The video of the lecture has also been posted [Caution: over 2 hours].

As an event, it's not particularly worth blogging about (for an outsider like me, especially). But, as IIT-M's student magazine has reported, something interesting happened near the end [if you feel like watching it, it appears a little after the 2-hour mark in the video]:

The lecture itself was quite captivating, and had the audience of around 300 very captivated and involved. However, it took an even more interesting turn towards the end, when the Dean of Students, Prof. L.S.Ganesh was called upon stage to hand over a memento to the speaker. Prof. Ganesh had objections to the Mr. Nayak’s claims about Satya Sai Baba and said that he (and another professor) had visited the late guru once and witnessed firsthand the creation of a ring within his palm, from thin air. In reaction to this, the speaker himself recreated the same trick on stage in an attempt to demonstrate its falsity, amidst some laughter from the crowd. Prof. Ganesh also claimed to believe in the power of homeopathic medicine and recalled examples wherein two german shepherds and a 2-month-old baby had been cured by it. “Absence of evidence is not the evidence of abscence,” said Prof. Ganesh. “Just because there is no evidence of the existence of something, you cannot debunk it. It is human arrogance to think that we know everything,” he went on. At this point, the stipulated time for the lecture was over, and the whole affair was called off, with Prof. Ganesh, the speaker, and a few students still discussing the issue.

* * *

Javali Carvaka, a member of the audience, has an extended post on the event. [I thank Carvaka for the comment-alert.]

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Links


  1. An eternity of infinities: the power and beauty of mathematics by Ashutosh Jogalekar in the Scientific American blog Curious Wavefunction.

  2. Science blogging, anonymity, and “being yourself” by Rahul Siddharthan at E's flat, ah's flat too.

  3. Male Scientists More Prone to Misconduct, Study Concludes by Jennifer Couzin-Frankel in Science Insider.

Apollo Robbins, the Pickpocket


And he is willing to reveal (some of) his techniques. Pretty awesome!


Direct link.

I4I on India's Missing Women


Over at Ideas for India, Debraj Ray (NYU) and Siwan Anderson (University of British Columbia) have a post on India's missing women by age and state:

What our research makes clear is that Indian women face the risk of excess mortality at every stage of their lives and that excess female mortality in adulthood is as serious a problem in India as missing girls who are never born or die prematurely in childhood.

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Chemistry in India


Prof. E. Arunan and Prof. G.R. Desiraju of IISc, Bangalore, along with their colleagues Dr. R. Brakaspathy (DST, New Delhi), and Dr. Sivaram (NCL, Pune) have published an article entitled Chemistry in India: Unlocking the Potential in Angewandte Chemie, a leading journal in the field. There is much in there for chemists to discuss and debate.

I want to excerpt one paragraph that invokes two causes of a general nature for the sorry state of higher education in India. Specifically, I am highlighting two things in it, the first for a possible factual error, and the second for its problematic framing.

A sound system of undergraduate education is a sine qua non of research excellence. Most Indian universities have had to contend with increasingly large numbers of aspiring students. Consequently, they ceded undergraduate education to smaller affiliated colleges and restricted themselves to postgraduate instruction and research. These affiliated institutions lacked funds, quality teaching staff, and research focus. They were also particularly vulnerable to political interference. It is no surprise that the quality of undergraduate training deteriorated rapidly. One of the casualties of the declining financials of affiliated colleges was the virtual elimination of laboratory instruction at the bachelor s and master s levels. This has had a telling effect on the preparedness of the students for research. There has been an attempt to bring back some undergraduate teaching into the ambit of a research university campus in some of the newly created institutions; however the numbers are still too small to make any noticeable impact. Most Indian universities have also had to battle with the competing demands of quantity and quality, in other words, the trade-off between equity and elitism in education. This battle is not likely to see any resolution soon, given the enormous diversity of the Indian population in terms of religion, ethnicity, language, class, and caste and income levels. [Bold emphasis added]

The first one is not quite correct: our universities never really were into UG teaching; with notable exceptions such as BHU, they have always been "just" examination-conducting bodies at the UG level. That they outsourced UG teaching to affiliated colleges because they "have had to contend with increasingly large numbers of aspiring students" doesn't ring true.

The second one is worth highlighting for the problematic framing that says our universities confront a "trade-off between equity and elitism". Even if this is not a comment about the reservation policy (I think it is), arguments based on a perceived dichotomy are not convincing. Especially since the notion that our universities are in the business of pursuing elitism would come as a shock to many. Or, more likely, the authors were talking about attracting elite students; in which case, I think the shock will be augmented by awe.

Monday, January 21, 2013

Inner Life of Stuff


The Up-Goer Five tool challenges you:

Can you explain a hard idea using only the ten hundred most used words? It's not very easy. Type in the box to try it out.

More about the tool here from its creator, Theo Sanderson. I saw it in action first at Suvrat Kher's post describing his research. Here's my attempt, a possible abstract for an upcoming talk on "computational modeling of microstructures and their evolution."

Inner Life of Stuff

We study pieces of matter. Each such piece, called stuff, could be water-like or rock-like, and we are especially interested in what goes on inside rock-like stuff. From the outside, such stuff may look as if it is the same at every place inside, but it is not! It turns out that, much as a house is made up of rooms, stuff is made up of lots and lots of small things, called parts. But, while rooms in a house can't grow bigger or smaller, parts inside stuff can! Some parts may grow bigger while others grow smaller. All this happens, quite easily even, when stuff gets hot.

So, here is the Big Idea: though stuff has no life to speak of, it enjoys some seriously beautiful inner life!

Why is this inner life of stuff important? Because it decides how well stuff works -- some kinds of packing are better than the others. So we need to understand how the parts come to be packed the way they are, and to figure out other ways of packing that make stuff work better. With this understanding, we can do some pretty cool things. We can take soft stuff and make it hard (or go the other way). Or, we can decide what, and how much, can move through it. Many things we use in our lives today -- lights, cars, flying air buses, computers -- are possible because we know how to control and change the inner life of stuff.

So, how do we get to understand the inner life of stuff? By building ideas about how parts change their form. Actually, we take a slightly different line: instead of focusing on parts, we focus on the walls between the parts. When a wall moves, the part on one side grows bigger, while that on the other side grows smaller. By watching walls move, we figure out how parts change their form.

While this is all easy to say, it is actually very, very hard to pull off. Instead of trying to crack the problem by writing on paper (and feeling let down!), we build make-believe stuff inside a computer. Just like real stuff has real parts and walls, the make-believe stuff has its own parts and walls. We then ask the computer to let its not-so-real walls move around just like real walls do. By watching changes in the make-believe stuff brought about by its moving walls, we get a good idea about changes in real stuff.

This talk is about how we study the inner life of stuff, and about what we get out of our studies. We start with walls, and why and how they move. We then show how we build make-believe stuff in a computer to watch moving walls and form-changing parts. We then talk about two very different kinds of stuff to show how our ideas work. Near the end of the talk, we have some things to say about looking at and studying stuff using computers, and about how it is not very different from studying stuff using things (such as focusing glasses) other than computers or paper.

Sunday, January 20, 2013

Sukhadeo Thorat on Social Science in India


Q. Ho far ICSSR has been successful in promoting social sciences research in India, according to you?

Sukhdeo Thorat: Since I joined ICSSR, I realised that it was hugely underfunded; the total allocation to ICSSR was only Rs. 36 crores, in 2010-11. It was during the time I joined, MHRD has set up committee to review the functioning of ICSSR and they made some positive recommendations. One of their recommendations was that social sciences research was hugely underfunded, and they recommended for 21 times increase in the allocation of fund. The academic quality suffers because of lack of funding for research, Ministry has taken a positive initiative and budget was increased to 400 crores which was later reduced to 100 crores.

I believe that neglecting social sciences research is problematic, because research helps us to understand the reality of society and once you understand the problem you can develop policies. Since, we are underfunding the research; it is focused on certain areas only.

That's from this interview with Prof. Thorat, who served as Chairman of University Grants Commission until two years ago. He's currently the Chairman of ICSSR [pdf].

Update: After Thorat, UGC had only an acting chairman in Prof. Ved Prakash all these months; he has just been appointed formally as UGC Chairman.

Saturday, January 19, 2013

Tamil Book Fair



For those unaware of it, the 36th Chennai annual book fair is on during this and next week (until 23rd Jan, 2013). Location: YMCA Physical Education College grounds (humongous and bang in the center of the city) in Nandhanam | Timings: Holidays 11 AM to 9:30 PM; other days: 2 PM to 9: 30 PM.

Primarily a Tamil books fair (few stalls with English language books), with more than 500 stalls, the visit is worth more than the token five rupees entry fee and even daunting for book readers. Here is a list of Tamil books (written in Tamil) that I recommend and bought (the two are different) at the fair.

The facilities (parking, food stalls and toilets) certainly don't discourage your visit. That I should be visiting it during this weekend could influence your plan for the weekend visit either way.

(Yes, the 'drawing' is a weak attempt at putting my computer to a different use from computing and writing)

Friday, January 18, 2013

Links


  1. Cathy Davidson at HASTAC: If We Profs Don't Reform Higher Ed, We'll Be Re-Formed (and we won't like it).

    If we profs can be replaced by a computer screen, we should be.

  2. Joseph Grcar in The American Scientist: Comments and Corrigenda in Scientific Literature -- How self-correcting is the written record of scientific and engineering endeavors?

  3. Eduardo Porter in NYTimes: When Public Outperforms Private in Services. A feature story on a recent book The Org: The Underlying Logic of the Office by Ray Fisman and Tim Sullivan:

    "The more we reward those things that we can measure, and not reward the things we care about but don’t measure, the more we will distort behavior,” observed Burton Weisbrod, a professor of economics at Northwestern University ... As Professor Fisman and Mr. Sullivan put it: “If what gets measured is what gets managed, then what gets managed is what gets done.”

    Here's an NPR interview of the authors.

Aaron Swartz Memorial Hacknight


In Bangalore. From 2 p.m. tomorrow to 8:00 a.m. Sunday. At the Centre for Internet and Society. Details here.

Thanks to Prof. S. Arunachalam for the e-mail alert. [Though I won't be able to go, it was heartening to see so many participants who have already registered.]