tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9818962.post2751798176712139170..comments2024-03-20T13:10:11.477+05:30Comments on nanopolitan: LinksAbihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06790560045313883673noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9818962.post-10057085236568547922012-09-19T03:55:26.673+05:302012-09-19T03:55:26.673+05:30P.S. One model of a report could be David Andow...P.S. One model of a report could be David Andow's on BT brinjal<br />http://www.gmwatch.org/files/Andow_Report_Bt_Brinjal.pdf<br />Even though this report is by one person, I think he was part of a group of concerned scientists at one stage. So the discussions need not prevent authors from their own individual take on issues. Glenn Davis Stone has some fine reports on BT cotton and in the recent EPW has a metareport on the research methodologies of different groups. I have in mind reports of this kind. I am not sure whether Stone comes from a group but he did field work in Warangal over several years.gaddeswaruphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16509075029154476375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9818962.post-1122950233235226812012-09-19T03:01:51.506+05:302012-09-19T03:01:51.506+05:30Abi,
It seems to me that issues like nuclear power...Abi,<br />It seems to me that issues like nuclear power, GM food etc are technically complex with a constant stream of different views. I wonder whether groups of academics can form groups like the defunct 'The Other Half', do some background consulting first and then start discussions. Somewhere Rahul says that he would like to see some numbers. Those seem to me missing in the discussions.gaddeswaruphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16509075029154476375noreply@blogger.com