tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9818962.post1055313770860849758..comments2024-03-20T13:10:11.477+05:30Comments on nanopolitan: Macbeth effectAbihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06790560045313883673noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9818962.post-74835686339317571702006-09-17T07:50:00.000+05:302006-09-17T07:50:00.000+05:30Pl. see the discussion here:
http://scienceblogs.c...Pl. see the discussion here:<br />http://scienceblogs.com/mixingmemory/2006/09/the_influence_of_irrelevant_em.php#comments<br />He has a few more survey articles (links in the above article). This author Chris does not seem to think that evolutionary psychology is necessary and moral issues can be studied by cognition experiments. that is the impression I get. One of the few referred to both groups is Antonio Damasio. I am still struggling with all these articles and have no final comments.gaddeswaruphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16509075029154476375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9818962.post-18629180746231922006-09-16T16:31:00.000+05:302006-09-16T16:31:00.000+05:30Abi,
This news is interesting for me, an agnostic...Abi, <br />This news is interesting for me, an agnostic tending towars atheism. It is not clear whether there are universal morals ( though some evolutionary psychologists tend to some universals; see http://www.umass.edu/preferen/gintis/buller.pdf). What this experiment seems to indicate is that most have moral sense ( whether it is the same for all is not clear). Hopefully (?), there are enough common elements to have an acceptable system of right and wrong for all. The experiment indicates that some aspects can be experimentally checked (?).<br />There is an interesting discussion http://www.janegalt.net/archives/009452.html<br />which may be considered (?) as applied aspects of this problem.gaddeswaruphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16509075029154476375noreply@blogger.com